Last week Neal Boortz had author Jerry Zeifman on his radio show to interview him about an article recently published by author Dan Calabrese, based on Zeifman’s book “Without Honor: Crimes of Camelot and Impeachment of President Nixon.” Dan Calabrese collaborated with Zeifman on this article about Hillary’s firing by Zeifman (life-long Democrat) during the Watergate hearings. From the article:

Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.

Why?

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week.

“She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

How could a 27-year-old House staff member do all that? She couldn’t do it by herself, but Zeifman said she was one of several individuals – including Marshall, special counsel John Doar and senior associate special counsel (and future Clinton White House Counsel) Bernard Nussbaum – who engaged in a seemingly implausible scheme to deny Richard Nixon the right to counsel during the investigation.

Why would they want to do that? Because, according to Zeifman, they feared putting Watergate break-in mastermind E. Howard Hunt on the stand to be cross-examined by counsel to the president. Hunt, Zeifman said, had the goods on nefarious activities in the Kennedy Administration that would have made Watergate look like a day at the beach – including Kennedy’s purported complicity in the attempted assassination of Fidel Castro.

It was an amazing interview, and I cannot believe (well, yes I can) that more media outlets have not picked up on this story. Unbelievable doesn’t begin to describe it. Yet believable it is.

Another small tome of Mr. Zeifman is “Hillary’s Pursuit of Power,” and it’s well worth the read. Please get your copies quick - they’re going fast, and not too many are available anymore.

You can watch/listen to the interview in three segments here, here and here.

Folks, I gotta tell you something…this was painful in more ways than one. First, she disses our troops, General Petraeus, Blackwater, President Bush, etc. Then she slams Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly and other Fox News folks. And then she goes to Colin Powell, Tony Snow, etc. calling them (as well as the previously aforementioned folks) liars and shills for the Bush administration. Janeane Garofolo has no shame, nor does she have any concept of hygiene.

When was the last time she washed her hair? Man, I’m telling you, this woman is on some serious mood-altering, uh *things.* How could you follow what she was saying? Why did she act like she was so cold? What was that itchy thing under her nose so much? And why did she act so paranoid? I don’t think it was the “BushCo” conspiracy she probably believes in. Nope, to me, she was having a pharmacological thing going on.

This was too good to let slide. So, here’s a montage of memorable moments from Real Time for September 21st, 2007.

By the way, my friend Noel Sheppard at Newsbusters did the back-breaking work of transcribing this “like, such as” garbage coming from this left-wing kook’s pie hole. Sorry Noel if I offend your sensibilities with my description, but when she talked about Gen. Petraeus and our troops like she did, it was like a first-time insult for me. Take no prisoners, babe. She does not deserve to live in the land of the free, because she so disrespects the brave who protect her very rights.

Noel provides us some of Janeane’s greatest hits from tonight:

• Our support of Israel to the detriment of the Palestinian people and the American people is not wise, and it’s been responsible for a lot of problems. And the way the mainstream media portrays the Palestinians is totally unfair…Our Israeli policy is very dangerous for us, and for them. I don’t think the Knesset, the rightwing of the Knesset, represents the Israeli people anymore than the rightwing of this government represents the American people.
• I don’t think that the Bush administration has prevented anything. I would say that if they’re using wiretapping - and they are - it’s for all the wrong reasons. And I think that they utilize fear, and, um, probably letting attacks happen. Republicans always use it.
• One person’s terrorist organization is another person’s national resistance movement. You know what I mean? There’s plenty of people that refer to some of the military in this country, and others, and in Britain, and in Israel, and in other places as terrorist organizations. Just depends on how you phrase it. They’re either a freedom fighter, or a terrorist, or whatever it is. It’s however you label it.
• Oh, Bill O’Reilly can kiss my fat ass…Bill O’Reilly can kiss my fat ass. I said it twice. And Sean Hannity, too. And Joe Scarborough.
• The CBS thing, the, the, Dan Rather’s lawsuit. I have no doubt that there were executives at CBS that, that folded under rightwing coercion, and did it very readily and, uh, fired him, or covered up the truth that the National Guard did provide preferential treatment to George Bush, Jr., and, it’s amazing how the rightwing has done it in this country, and it doesn’t seem like it’s a democracy at all.
• First of all, General Petraeus has been dishonest. That is sort of the role of a soldier like that. They, just like General Westmoreland and the five o’clock report to Vietnam. Of course they are dishonest. That’s what they do. And the thing is that to pretend that it’s MoveOn.org that has the problem, and that the mainstream media allows that nonsense to continue. Yet, he is betraying us.
• Colin Powell knew he was lying in that “War of the Worlds” scenario in front of the United Nations…If Colin Powell had, had, found his integrity on that day that he addressed the United Nations, he could have changed the entire history of most of the world on that day. And, he probably would have been taken out by a sniper. I’m sure they had snipers waiting around to get a poison arrow right there in his carotid artery.
• First of all, George Bush is a war criminal, and so is Saddam Hussein.

One of her most egregious comments? How about this one:

“First of all General Petreus has been dishonest. That is sort of the role of a soldier like that. Just like Gen. Westmooreland, and like the 5 o’clock report to Viet Nam. Of course they are dishonest; that’s what they do. And the thing is to pretend that is Moveon.Org that has the problem, and that the mainstream media allows that nonsense to continue. Yet he is betraying us.”

Watch the video montage here.

This is leftist, 9/11 conspiracy whackjob, John Conner, who apparently thinks he’s important enough to walk up to people on the street and engage them in a discussion about his beliefs that 9/11 was an inside job. Well, John Conner, meet Danny Bonaduce, the red-headed fireball from the Partridge Family.

GO DANNY GO!

Who is this strange woman who is supposedly a correspondent for Air America? Christy Harvey admits she’s a “conspiray whackadoodle” when a typical moonbat caller gives his opinions while calling in to C-SPAN (PBS Lite). Christy is on with Hugh Hewitt to discuss the moonbattery that’s going on with the evil Diebold machines, WMD claims, etc. This is priceless to see, and the caller shows exactly how the Kool-Aid is affecting the looney left.

God help us all.

Watch Hugh be bemused here.

This has to be what can only be deemed as rounds #2, 3, 4 & 5 of the WWF of the political world. Cynthia is trying so hard to keep her belt, but it’s getting harder and harder. However, I wasn’t sure Hank was going to make it. Was he coughing to disrupt the cutest little jihadist in Congress as she spewed her blather from the inside of the skull-tightening braids on her head? Or did her hot air scorch the air around them both so bad that he couldn’t breathe? Don’t know. Neither one impressed me very much, but even as his incompetence is so profoundly displayed, the “lesser of two evils” argument needs to be thrown out of the window this time.

I don’t live in that district, but what I wouldn’t give to live there for just one day next Tuesday in November to vote for the Republican - whomever he/she may be - to keep either of these less-than-brainiacs out of the Georgia Congress. That being said, Georgia’s 4th District is and always has been Democratically controlled. Given that, I hope that the voters of that district “get out the vote” next Tuesday for Hank Johnson. Hank doesn’t look like someone who would smack a police officer who was just doing his job on Capitol Hill.

For round #1, see my previous post here. These new rounds, however, are TKOs by the moderators of the debate. I’m not sure either opponent won this one.

“The fact of the matter is….” (watch the videos to understand that oft-used opening to McKinney’s statements - it was akin to “well, you know.. like, it was so, I mean, so, like, you know, we were the evil, like country, like you know?) Can I have a dollar for every time she said that? Aw, shucks… okay.

This was VERY painful to watch. However, it was not only painful, but it was also - again - entertaining on cell-slapper Cynthia’s part. She is the queen of the “non-answer” coalition, and her biggest claim to fame in this debate and others, and by her own admission, is that she is the “#1 biggest critic of the Bush Administration.” Okay, so that puts you where in your political standing? It makes you no greater or higher in prestige than Pelosi, Dean, Boxer, Reid, Kerry, Kennedy, Murtha, and on and on and on. What? Are you guys all going to get into a fight to determine the WWF champion of who is THE biggest Bush critic? I think that can be won by the lunatic left collectively; so, no, Cynthia, you do not deserve a special place at the table of the Democratic party.

The Georgia Columbus Ledger had an AP piece on today’s debate:

Johnson says he is not a Republican pawn and he started running his race before the “ABC” - “Anybody but Cynthia” - campaign began. He said that of the more than 1,400 individual contributions his campaign has received, most were donations of $100 or less. Johnson said his campaign has identified only three contributions from known Republicans.

“I can guarantee the public my allegiance is to the voters,” Johnson said.

The candidates for the 4th Congressional District squared off in a live hour-long debate aired on WSB-TV. It was the last televised debate before Tuesday’s runoff election.

In the July 18th primary, Johnson, an attorney and former DeKalb County Commissioner, came within 1,700 votes of McKinney to force a runoff.

During the debate, Johnson twice questioned McKinney about the March scuffle between the congresswoman and a Capitol Hill police officer, asking her to tell voters what really happened that day. McKinney said the grand jury had spoken on the issue and vindicated her.

“What is a woman to do when she is grabbed from behind?” McKinney asked. “The grand jury knows everything about that incident. Mr. Johnson wasn’t there and he doesn’t know anything.”

Johnson seized upon the Capitol Hill incident as an example of what he has called McKinney’s embarrassing leadership in office. While he has spent much of his campaign contrasting himself to McKinney’s outspoken, confrontational style, Johnson says he thinks voters believe he is the best candidate for the job and not just an alternative to the controversial Congresswoman.

“I think the ‘Anybody But Cynthia’ campaign has turned into the ‘We Love Hank’ campaign,” he quipped.

McKinney called herself the “Number One critic of the Bush administration” and urged voters to send her back to Washington.

“I stand in stark contrast to the Republican majority, and I’m proud of that,” McKinney said. “I promise to go to Washington and never be quiet.”

When questioned about the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah and the need for an immediate cease-fire, McKinney said that every country has a right to self-defense, but that the U.S. should be doing more to encourage peace in the region and take more of a stand for human rights for Israeli and Lebanese civilians. Johnson said the U.S. should stand by Israel as its ally.

“It’s very difficult to call a cease-fire with a terrorist organization,” Johnson said.

Some of the highlights and lowlights of the debate today include, but are not limited to:

- Cynthia makes claims about putting 500 participants into the National Youth Apprenticeship Collaboration Program, but the panel even calls her on the carpet on that one, reminding her that there are only 20 known participants in it.

- The only two backers McKinney claims have supported legislation she’s proposed were John Kerry and John Murtha. ‘Nuff said.

- Hank Johnson rightly reminds her that the only successful legislation she’s passed was the re-naming of a U.S. Post Office (Lord knows which one this is, because I certainly can’t find it).

- McKinney cited the Martin Luther King Records Release Act she introduced - but where was the mention of her Tupac Amaru Shakur act she introdoced? Didn’t mention it.

- When repeatedly asked by the moderator, whether or not America should take a side in the Israeli/Hezbollah conflict, McKinney kept repeating the mantra “The United States should be an honest broker and it should respect human rights across the board.” I believe she was asked this 3 times, and she had the same answer all three times; i.e., a non-answer.

- When asked what the United States should have done after the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah broke out, McKinney again said that we should be an “honest broker,” should have called for peace, and an immediate cease-fire (I wonder does she think Hezbollah should also immediately “cease fire?”).

- When asked by the moderator “should we take a side?” in the Middle East conflict, McKinney again repeated the mantra ‘The United States should be an honest broker and it should respect human rights across the board.” The moderator asked her 2 or 3 times to give him a straight answer, and she never once said ‘yes’ we should take a side, or ‘no’ we shouldn’t…. so the moderator answered her FOR her! HA!

- McKinney keeps referring to Hank’s contributions from developers of “high-density dwellings.” What the hell else do you think the projects are going to be comprised of? Single-family homes that sell for $250K and up? Grow up, Cynthia…. you could buy a hundred of those “dwellings” with all of your contributions from Arabs solely on 9/11/01! By the way…the opposite of high-density dwellings is single-family homes. Which, in her world, would include the evil rich. But Johnson must be villified for colluding with these very developers of the HDDs.

- Well, thank you Cynthia. She tells the viewer audience adamantly that she is not asking for the Republican vote, nor is she asking for any Republican money. Apparently Republican money is very dirty. However, as noted in her FEC report, she WILL take $3,000 from the President of the American Muslim Foundation on - you guessed it - 9/11/01. Oh, by the way… she skewers Hank Johnson for having any Republican contributors. She reminds us that she is and remains a “peace-and-justice Democrat.” You mean kinda like Murtha, Kerry, Dean, Kucinich, et. al? Yeah, what a nice club to belong to.

- Cynthia also rips Hank for supporting “big” business, and says it’s actually small businesses that “are the key to economic growth,” and gives the impression that big business is bad. Oh, really, Cindy? Who’s brought more business and economic growth to more towns in America? Wal-Mart, or Bubba’s Bait Shop?

- The subject of federal funding for the No Child Left Behind Act came up, and even though Hank talked about “unfunded initiatives,” the moderator reminded him that “Federal funding has increased enormously during this (current) Administration.”

- Speaking of the “No Child Left Behind Act,” Cynthia accused Hank of selling out the children, decrying the fact that “children are learning in trailers because Mr. Johnson can’t say ‘no’ to high-density developers.” Excuse me? What is wrong with learning in trailers? In fact, I know of THOUSANDS of schools that have extended classrooms on the peripheries of their properties, and I don’t think the children are learning any less. Besides, trailers are smaller, so the class size is probably smaller, and that’s a better deal for the students. Wait… is Cindy disparaging people who live in trailers? How dare she! She’s judging those who should not be judged! Oh, wait… I forgot… she’s black so she’s part of the liberal doctrine of infallability. So, you can’t argue with her, because if you do, you’re a racist. Get it now? And her answer to appropriately funding the “No Child Left Behind Act” if re-enacted? BRING THE TROOPS HOME NOW! Yes, this raving lunatic says that! Unbelievable. She needs some work on her segues and connection of coherent thoughts and ideas.

- Cynthia says she was the FIRST one to ask tough questions about 9/11, and it can be documented in a film she’s pimping called “American Blackout.”

- Johnson and the panel of interviewers call Cynthia on the carpet about her TRUE House record. She says she has the highest congressional efficiency rating of the Democrats in Georgia.Yes, Johnson rightly points out that if you put out one piece of legislation in 12 years, and it passes, that would give anybody a high “efficiency” rating. Example: If you have been driving for 20 years, and you have had only one accident in that time period and the other driver got the ticket, in this reference, you’ll get the “accident forgiveness” deal with AllState.

- Then the moderator asks both McKinney and Johnson if they can name two uses of the U.S. Military in the past couple of decades that were a good thing, other than humanitarian efforts (tsunami, hurricanes, etc). Johnson names Afghanistan then draws a blank. Then, as usual, Cynthia answers with a non-answer, and is prompted by the moderator to please just answer the question - McKinney is the obvious loser in this argument as well.

- Both are then asked about Georgia National Guard troops going to the border to secure it and help cut down on illegal immigration. Johnson supports the effort, but as usual, Cynthia says the way to really enforce border security is to “improve our foreign policy” so that the “pull to America isn’t there.” What? So do you want us to go into countries to help form democracies or not, Cindy?

- She says that we should not “sacrifice the character of our country and who we are in the pursuit of our nation’s security.” Huh? Sorry… I really don’t get it. Can someone please explain that to me?

Oh, and people… this was the ABSOLUTE kicker! Are we a force for good or ill will in the world?

This last quesion is finally posed to both candidates: “Do you think the United States is a force for good or ill in the world?” The question was first asked to Johnson, and he was weak initially….but then when it was Cynthia’s turn, she didn’t disappoint. The moderator finally gave up asking “good or ill?” I swear people… I was going to transcribe this and just edit out the “good” parts, but Holy Cow!… when you have fodder like this, how can it be edited or published without some degree of inaccuracy?

I’ve captured the hour-long debate into 4 segments, which can be seen below.

I’ll edit/add more tomorrow from Cynthia’s record from the House Armed Services Committee (yes, she is serving there). The pages on Cynthia are from 510-534 (large .pdf). It’s from the “2007 Committee Report” from the House Armed Services Committee, and pgs. 510-534 contain her “dissenting opinion.” Her claim to fame, again, is that she is the #1 biggest critic of Bush - she punctuates that point by prefacing and ending her podium time with that proclamation.

You can see the four clips from today here, here, here and here.

Cross-posted over at Expose the Left.

A friend of mine sent me this link, and I have to say I was stunned when I watched the “Pallywood” video. This isn’t just your typical conspiracy theory, people; this is legitimate and with audio/visual proof of the Palestinian production company that is paid to make Palestinians’ “deaths” and “injuries” look factual.

Apparently this is not very new, however it was new to me - but relevant still the same and worthy of passing around. For those of you out there who do NOT believe that a lot of the B.S. casualties on the Hezbollah, Hamas, Palestinian sides are just that - B.S - this post is just for you! Some are obviously nothing more than what is created in the director’s studio for the media idiots to buy into, swallowing hook, link, and, in this case, stinker!

From the site Second Draft, you can read and see the truth also about the Al Durha “incident.” From the Pallywood video, here’s what the producers say:

“The material we show here constitutes a tiny fragment of a much larger phenomenon, raw footage from Palestinian photographers working for major western media outlets. From this material, our news agencies prepare news reports that shape our perceptions of what is happening in the Middle East Conflict.

We think that a close analysis of this material defies all expectations of what such footage should resemble, and suggest that Palestinian photographers do not at all share the same production and journalistic values espoused by a free press. We leave the experience and the judgment to you:”

So, like they suggest, you watch for yourself and YOU decide. This is absolutely astonishing, and I can’t believe I’ve not heard of this before.

Second Draft has a new investigative film out, as mentioned above, on the Al Durha alleged incident. It’s called “Birth of an Icon: Al Durah - What Happened?”

The image that captured the world’s attention - was it true?

“People who followed Middle East news in 2000 cannot forget the image of Muhamed al Durah, gunned down in a hail of Israeli bullets at the very beginning of the Al Aqsa Intifada. The impact of this dramatic footage on global culture is close to incalculable. Its prominence goes far beyond any other image from this terrible conflict and its impact goes far beyond any of its other images, one of “the most powerful images of the past 50 years,” one of the shaping images of this young 21st century. One extreme claims that it reveals Israeli malevolence and wanton violence, deliberately targeting a defenseless child and killing him in cold blood. “In killing this boy the Israelis killed every child in the world” (Osama bin Laden). The other side claims that it was either staged or a snuff film that reveals the ruthless and paranoid nature of PA media culture… the first blood libel of the 21st century. Even-handedness – Who knows who did it? It’s a tragedy – doesn’t work here. If we hope to learn anything from this terrible event, it will come from examination. We put the evidence before you and the five possible scenarios with arguments for and against. Judge for yourself.”

Each movie is about 15 minutes, so total 30 minutes of your time. I urge you all to watch both of them, as this is such a very important issue in our time. Stay informed, stay alert, and stay safe. God bless America, and to hell with the mainstream media! I will never look at the Islamofascists “casualty” reporting the same again.

Watch the “Al Durah” video here.

Cross-posted over at Expose the Left.

…and Michelle Malkin, as usual, is all over it!