Folks, this is a very disturbing article, and for many other reasons that just the obvious. Why do McCain pundits and supporters wonder why the conservative movement is so reticent to blindly thrust their support behind McCain? For me it’s always been one of those gnawing things that I just couldn’t put my finger on, besides the obvious immigration, Bush tax cuts, etc., issues. Then I get a tip from a friend about a recent article he’s found at WorldNetDaily. From the article:

The CIA is a left-wing, liberal outfit, and its main job for some time now is not attacking America’s enemies but conservatives in general and George W. Bush in particular. The story is best told by friend Ken Timmerman in his new book “Shadow Warriors.”

When the time is right, the Clintons will see to the leaking of the GRU archives on McCain to the media. Bet on it, just as you can bet they’ll follow it up with media disclosures of the lady lobbyists in Washington having adulterous affairs with McCain. (There are at least three of them; I know the name of one, but I’m not going to put it in writing.)

Maybe McCain will try to fight back by confirming Hillary’s well-known bisexuality and her lesbian affair with her beautiful assistant, Huma Abedin. Google “Hillary” and “Huma Abedin,” and you’ll get almost 6,000 hits. Turns out Huma is a Muslim who grew up in Saudi Arabia and is strongly suspected of working for Saudi intelligence.

Or maybe he’ll capitulate to Clinton blackmail. You never can tell what a psychologically unstable guy will do.

And that last point is why ? be prepared for this, folks ? I would not in any circumstances vote for John McCain, not if either Hillary or Obama were the alternative. Evil is safer than crazy. Leftie amateur inexperience is safer than crazy. So I agree with Ann Coulter who says:

“I’d rather deal with President Hillary than with President McCain. With Hillary, we’ll get the same ruinous liberal policies with none of the responsibility.”

How in the world can the Republican Party get saddled with a nutcase wack job who knows nothing about economics, is so anti-capitalist he uses “profit” as a term of derision, has never run a business or had any job outside of government, will raise taxes, is so stupid that he believes “stopping global warming” is worth destroying the American economy, won’t drill ANWR, won’t appoint strict constructionist justices, won’t protect marriage, will give amnesty to 20 million illegal aliens, is beloved by the New York Times and lives in a delusionary world of vanity and rage?

Rush is right. A McCain presidency will be the destruction of the Republican Party. It needs to be rebuilt, not wiped out with the field clear for the fascists of the left to consolidate power and eliminate freedom.

And maybe the only way to rebuild it is in dedicated impassioned opposition to a Clinton White House. That should be the subject of Ann Coulter’s next book. I’ve already got the title for her. Her last book was “If Democrats Had Any Brains, They’d Be Republicans.”

Very disturbing indeed. The question is, what is a true conservative to do this election season? Regardless of whether McCain or a Democrat wins in ‘08, we’re all going to be losers. There’s not even a win/lose situation - it’s a lose/lose all around. God help us all.

Today at CPAC, Presidential candidate, Mitt Romney, announced the suspension of his campaign. This has to be one of the best speeches I’ve ever heard him give, and it’s kind of reminiscent of how I felt after that one performance by Fred in one of the last debates: “Where has THIS guy been?” I voted for Romney, and I’m pissed about what Huckabee and McCain did together. Yes, I know, all politicians do it. But when you put yourself out there as holier than thou like Huckabee did from the get-go, then he loses my respect when he out-and-out lies claiming McCain was the real conservative over Romney. And the thing is, I liked Huckabee in the beginning, mostly because of the FairTax, but I knew he didn’t have a snow-ball’s chance in hell to win - and still doesn’t.

Funny thing to me, though, is Mitt’s choice of term to use about his campaign - suspension. He didn’t say he was dropping out. He didn’t say he was quitting. His delegates, at this point, are still in play. This may be a stretch, but perhaps we shouldn’t count him out yet.

Oh, and if McCain is smart (which requires another form of suspension - of disbelief) he would select Romney as his running mate.

Watch Mitt’s rousing speech here.

A good friend of mine has a no-miss blog. Catch her at “Not Ready For My Burqa” whenever you want. Current, up-to-date humor and commentary is all you need to want. According to her 1-year anniversary post:

My Blog is One Year Old Today!

Thank you to everyone who has visited and made this such a great year. It is wonderful to know that even a small blog can play a part in the defining struggle of our day, the fight against the global jihad that threatens our freedom and our civilization. I’m not a soldier or a politician or a diplomat, so my part is not a big one. But I have had the privilege of writing in support of those who do play a leading role in defending our freedom, and praying for those who suffered at the hands of the jihadis. And so I feel this year has been well spent, and hope that this next year will be even more fruitful.

I have been blessed with some great friends this past year and I would like to thank all of them, especially Rick at the Lobster Pot, whose encouragement every step of the way has been a priceless gift; Ms. Underestimated, for her kindness and patience in helping me learn the technical details when I was first starting out; Vimto for designing my logo and for his great cartoons; and Rusty at the Jawa Report for picking me to be on his team and letting me hang out with the cool guys.

God bless you all and bring us victory in the coming year.

Go see what Vicki has to offer. She’s worth the read, I promise.

…Watching this GOP Presidential debate on Fox makes me realize what chickenshits the Dems really are. Comparing Brit, Wendall, and Chris’ questions to the panel, is like comparing Chris Matthews’ previous MSNBC debate questions to the panel as Shakespeare is to Sesame Street. This was a MUCH better debate because Brit et. al know much better what the definition of a “qualifying question” is.

Chris Matthews is/was a blithering idiot, and the MSNBC debate ratings showed it. But now I understand why the Dems wussed out of the Fox-sponsored debate in Nevada. My God, if Brit, Wendall and Chris are going to be this tough on Republicans, then Lord have mercy, the Dems SURELY have no chance! You just wait… the Kossacks, DUers and their ilk will all say the GOP candidates were soft-balled. I just challenge you to watch it and see if you can remain the blind myrmidon the Kossacks demand you to be.

Ah, why does it matter? I know the democraps will never change. But isnt’ it fun imagining them squatting in a corner of their basement, rocking back and forth, sucking their thumb, and simultaneously wetting themselves? True bliss that image is! Ahhhhh…

Oh, yeah… never take your liberal girlfriend to a truly intellectual debate. The above results may ensue.

P.S. It’s getting late but I have video of this whole debate, but won’t be able to edit/post it until tomorrow. Trust me, this one was more worthy of attention than the MSNBC charade. Check back for video segments of some good smack-downs, too. The only thing that could have made this not only a better debate, but probably an all-out landslide would be if Fred Thompson would have been a participant. Run, Fred, RUN!!!

Oh, man, I can’t believe how his family and other Hollyweirdos have tossed him under the bus. Stephen Baldwin is more interested in saving souls for Jesus Christ than he is for scoring points in Hollywood. I love this man, and I pray that his groups’ prayers can work on the rest of Hollywood.

Stephen, keep up the good work. I love you, brother.

Watch Stephen Baldwin, the born-again Christian, on Nightline here.

This may be a repeat, or one you’ve already seen before, but it’s worthy of a second look:

A young woman was about to finish her first year of college. Like so many others her age, she considered herself to be a very liberal Democrat and supported the distribution of all wealth. She felt deeply ashamed that her father was a rather staunch Republican which she expressed openly.

One day she was challenging her father on his beliefs and his opposition to higher taxes on the rich & the addition of more government welfare programs. Based on the lectures that she had participated in and the occasional chat with a professor, she felt that for years her father had obviously harbored an evil, even selfish desire to keep what he thought should be his. The self-professed objectivity proclaimed by her professors had to be the truth and she indicated so to her father.

He stopped her and asked her, point blank, how she was doing in school. She answered rather haughtily that she had a 4.0 GPA, and let him know that it was tough to maintain. She studied all the time and never had time to go out and party like other people she knew. She didn’t even have time for a boyfriend and didn’t really have many college friends because of spending all her time studying because of her more difficult curriculum.

Her father listened and then asked, “How is your good friend Mary doing?”

“Mary is barely getting by,” she replied. “She barely has a 2.0 GPA, and all she takes are easy classes and she never studies. But Mary is extremely popular on campus. College, for her, is a blast. She goes to all the parties all the time and very often doesn’t even show up for classes because she is too hung over.”

Her father then asked his daughter, “Why don’t you go to the Dean’s office and ask him to deduct a 1.0 off your 4.0 GPA and give it to your friend who only has a 2.0? That way you will both have a 3.0 GPA and certainly that would be a fair and equal distribution of GPA.”

The daughter, visibly shocked by her father’s suggestion, angrily fired back, “That wouldn’t be fair! I worked really hard for mine and Mary has done little or nothing! She played while I worked real hard!”

The father slowly smiled, winked and said, “Welcome to the Republican Party.”

How true is this?

This week Wictory Wednesday is supporting the reelection of Senator George Allen of Virginia. Sen. Allen has been a consistent supporter of conservative values in the Senate, earning a place in the ranks of the American Conservative Union’s Best and Brightest.

Sen. Allen is a supporter of fiscal conservativism and introduced legislations to require a balanced budget. He also supported a law that would dock congressmen’s paychecks if they failed to produce a budget by October 1st. The idea that legislators should be penalized for failure to do the few things they must do is one that should be whole-heartedly supported.

While Senator Allen does support accountability for school systems and supporting programs that succeed, support for school choice is notably lacking. There is no better accountability than allowing people to leave failing schools, taking tax dollars with them.

Illegal immigration is an issue many legislators are running away from while Senator Allen has the courage to take a stand. He understands what should be common-sense, immigrating legally is a good thing, immigrating illegally is a bad thing. It is obvious that decades of not enforcing immigration law hasn’t worked and perhaps it’s time we give law and order a chance. We don’t need to demean the people who came here while the government basically said it wouldn’t enforce the law, but that doesn’t mean blanket amnesty… or for that matter, lavishing rewards on illegal immigrants.

Lastly, while it has become chic for members of Congress to suggest it’s time to surrender to America’s enemies and to proclaim that America is the cause of every world problem, Senator Allen understands that no victory came through surrender. The war on terror and Iraq are difficult problems that lesser men run away from by planting their heads in the sand. Winning the War in Iraq takes time and with plans for troop reductions under way, it’s clear that “stay the course” is not only a strategy, but a strategy that’s working.

Please considering donating to Sen. Allen’s reelection campaign or volunteering your time.

This has been a production of the Wictory Wednesday blogburst. If you would like to join Wictory Wednesday, please see this post or contact John Bambenek at jcb (dot) blog [at] gmail {dot} com. The following sites are members of the Wictory Wednesday team: