Last week Neal Boortz had author Jerry Zeifman on his radio show to interview him about an article recently published by author Dan Calabrese, based on Zeifman’s book “Without Honor: Crimes of Camelot and Impeachment of President Nixon.” Dan Calabrese collaborated with Zeifman on this article about Hillary’s firing by Zeifman (life-long Democrat) during the Watergate hearings. From the article:

Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.

Why?

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week.

“She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

How could a 27-year-old House staff member do all that? She couldn’t do it by herself, but Zeifman said she was one of several individuals – including Marshall, special counsel John Doar and senior associate special counsel (and future Clinton White House Counsel) Bernard Nussbaum – who engaged in a seemingly implausible scheme to deny Richard Nixon the right to counsel during the investigation.

Why would they want to do that? Because, according to Zeifman, they feared putting Watergate break-in mastermind E. Howard Hunt on the stand to be cross-examined by counsel to the president. Hunt, Zeifman said, had the goods on nefarious activities in the Kennedy Administration that would have made Watergate look like a day at the beach – including Kennedy’s purported complicity in the attempted assassination of Fidel Castro.

It was an amazing interview, and I cannot believe (well, yes I can) that more media outlets have not picked up on this story. Unbelievable doesn’t begin to describe it. Yet believable it is.

Another small tome of Mr. Zeifman is “Hillary’s Pursuit of Power,” and it’s well worth the read. Please get your copies quick - they’re going fast, and not too many are available anymore.

You can watch/listen to the interview in three segments here, here and here.

Today on Fox News, Clinton supporter Stephanie Tubbs-Jones was on talking about the election with Shepard Smith. Asked about whether or not she thought NAFTA would be a negative point for Hillary, Tubbs-Jones had this to say:

Well, you now what, the camp, the Obama campaign is trying to put that noose on her neck. But the reality is that Senator Clinton does not wear, uh, NAFTA.

NAFTA is something that occurred during the presidency of her husband. She was the first lady, but she has been very clear about NAFTA.

Noel Sheppard at Newsbusters is also on this, and has a great post about it. Do you think for one second, that with the recent controversies about nooses, that if one white person had said this about a black person, the media would have given it a free pass? Not on your life! The hypocrisy is blinding.

You can watch the video here.

Folks, this is a very disturbing article, and for many other reasons that just the obvious. Why do McCain pundits and supporters wonder why the conservative movement is so reticent to blindly thrust their support behind McCain? For me it’s always been one of those gnawing things that I just couldn’t put my finger on, besides the obvious immigration, Bush tax cuts, etc., issues. Then I get a tip from a friend about a recent article he’s found at WorldNetDaily. From the article:

The CIA is a left-wing, liberal outfit, and its main job for some time now is not attacking America’s enemies but conservatives in general and George W. Bush in particular. The story is best told by friend Ken Timmerman in his new book “Shadow Warriors.”

When the time is right, the Clintons will see to the leaking of the GRU archives on McCain to the media. Bet on it, just as you can bet they’ll follow it up with media disclosures of the lady lobbyists in Washington having adulterous affairs with McCain. (There are at least three of them; I know the name of one, but I’m not going to put it in writing.)

Maybe McCain will try to fight back by confirming Hillary’s well-known bisexuality and her lesbian affair with her beautiful assistant, Huma Abedin. Google “Hillary” and “Huma Abedin,” and you’ll get almost 6,000 hits. Turns out Huma is a Muslim who grew up in Saudi Arabia and is strongly suspected of working for Saudi intelligence.

Or maybe he’ll capitulate to Clinton blackmail. You never can tell what a psychologically unstable guy will do.

And that last point is why ? be prepared for this, folks ? I would not in any circumstances vote for John McCain, not if either Hillary or Obama were the alternative. Evil is safer than crazy. Leftie amateur inexperience is safer than crazy. So I agree with Ann Coulter who says:

“I’d rather deal with President Hillary than with President McCain. With Hillary, we’ll get the same ruinous liberal policies with none of the responsibility.”

How in the world can the Republican Party get saddled with a nutcase wack job who knows nothing about economics, is so anti-capitalist he uses “profit” as a term of derision, has never run a business or had any job outside of government, will raise taxes, is so stupid that he believes “stopping global warming” is worth destroying the American economy, won’t drill ANWR, won’t appoint strict constructionist justices, won’t protect marriage, will give amnesty to 20 million illegal aliens, is beloved by the New York Times and lives in a delusionary world of vanity and rage?

Rush is right. A McCain presidency will be the destruction of the Republican Party. It needs to be rebuilt, not wiped out with the field clear for the fascists of the left to consolidate power and eliminate freedom.

And maybe the only way to rebuild it is in dedicated impassioned opposition to a Clinton White House. That should be the subject of Ann Coulter’s next book. I’ve already got the title for her. Her last book was “If Democrats Had Any Brains, They’d Be Republicans.”

Very disturbing indeed. The question is, what is a true conservative to do this election season? Regardless of whether McCain or a Democrat wins in ‘08, we’re all going to be losers. There’s not even a win/lose situation - it’s a lose/lose all around. God help us all.

You gotta be kiddin’ me, right? Well, according to the Politico, the Hildabeast is saying just that:

“You can always tell when the Republicans are getting restless, because the Vice President’s motorcade pulls into the Capitol, and Darth Vader emerges,” Clinton said just now at Town Hall in New York, referring to Cheney’s efforts shore up Republican congressional support for the Iraq war.

“I’m not invited to their meetings and I don’t know what he says or does,” she said. “But all the brave talk [about ending the war] just dissipates.”

I’m stunned - just stunned. Hey, Shrillary…you’re not invited to their “meetings?” I’d rather be associated with a ‘Darth Vader’ than the tinfoil hat-wearing moonbats, madam, since you refuse to repudiate the MoveOn.org ad about Gen. Petraeus. Just keep doing what you’re doing, Senator…you’ll soon remember your past cannot escape you in your bid for the presidency. You are not exempt from the left nor the right, and you deserve the respect of neither.

And remember most of all that your husband spoke so negatively about the “politics of personal destruction.” Is that a policy you want to welcome, or one you want to shun? So far, it’s sounding like a full-on embrace. Enjoy the relationship, as it appears to be one you’re reveling in.

Oh, wait… was that a stone coming toward your glass house window? Oops!

When it comes to Scooter Libby’s prison sentence commutation, Ro-ro has this to say on her blog:

only commutation
of obstruction of justice sentence
by a president
ever

Does Rosie ever do any research outside the 9-11 truthers? Well, Ms. (or is it Mr. or Mrs.?) O’Donnell, your pal, best bud, Slick Willy did that and WORSE during his presidency! During Billy Boy’s term, according to the DOJ, here are just a few of the stand-up folks Clinton pardoned (and some for the same or similar reasons!):

NAME, DISTRICT, SENTENCED, OFFENSE

Linda Jones, (fka Linda D. Medlar) N. D. Tex. 1998
Conspiracy to commit bank fraud, to make a false statement to a bank, to launder monetary instruments, and to engage in monetary transactions in property derived from specific unlawful activity; aiding and abetting bank fraud; aiding and abetting false statements to a bank; aiding and abetting laundering monetary instruments; aiding and abetting engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from specific unlawful activity; obstruction of justice; falsifying, concealing and covering up a material fact by trick, scheme, or device; making a false statement; 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 371, 1001, 1014, 1344(1) and (2), 1503, 1956(a)(1)(A)(i) and (B)(i), and 1957/

Jackie Lee Miller N. D. Okla. 1983
Conspiracy to defraud the United States, 18 U.S.C. § 371

Thomas Peter Stathakis D. So. Car. 1976
Selling and delivering firearms to out-of-state resident and falsifying firearms records, 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(b)(3), 922(m), and 924(a)

Kathleen Vacanti C. D. Calif. 1979
Conspiracy to defraud the United States by obtaining payment of false claims, presenting false claims to the United States, forging a writing, and aiding and abetting, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 286, 287, and 495

Giuseppe Casadei-Severei D. Puerto Rico 1987
Obstruction of justice, 18 U.S.C. § 1503

Monroe Lee King S. D. Tex. 1973
Making plates for counterfeiting Federal Reserve Notes, 18 U.S.C. § 474

Charles Patrick Murrin C. D. Calif. 1988
Bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a)

David Walter Ratliff N. D. Okla. 1981
Making false statement to the government, 18 U.S.C. § 1001

Kevin Lester Teker W. D. Wash. 1989
Maliciously damaging property used in an activity affecting interstate commerce by means of an explosive, 18 U.S.C. § 844(i)

Darrin Dean Dorn S. D. Iowa 1981
Conspiracy to damage property by means and use of an explosive, 18 U.S.C. § 371

William Arthur Borders, Jr. N. D. Ga.1982
Conspiracy to corruptly solicit and accept money in return for influencing the official acts of a federal district court judge, and to defraud the United States in connection with the performance of lawful government functions; corruptly influencing, obstructing, impeding, and endeavoring to influence, obstruct, and impede the due administration of justice, and aiding and abetting therein; traveling interstate with intent to commit bribery, 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1503, 2, and 1952

Pincus Green S. D. N. Y. 1984 superseding indictment
Wire fraud, mail fraud, racketeering, racketeering conspiracy, criminal forfeiture, income tax evasion, and trading with Iran in violation of trade embargo, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343, 1341, 1962(c), 1962(d), 1963, and 2; 26 U.S.C. § 7201, 50 U.S.C. § 1705, and 31 C.F.R. §§ 535.206(a)(4), 535.208 and 535.701

Patricia Campbell Hearst Shaw N. D. Calif. 1976
Armed bank robbery and using a firearm during a felony, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113(a) and (d) and 924(c)(1)

Folks, this is only the BEGINNING of the cretins pardoned by Slick Willy, and a majority of them involve bank and wire fraud, cocaine charges, stolen vehicles, using explosive devices, and on and on and on. So please, just humor me here liberals. What in this list comes even CLOSE to what Scooter Libby was convicted of? You guys are so blinded by your hatred for Bush, you cannot see the horizon for the forest that is the evil anti-christ you think is President Bush. Guess your hero, Bill Clinton, just helped out some poor mis-guided soles who really made innocent mistakes in their lives. Yeah, right.

Hilarious yet scary parody, new from Atom Films.

Run, run for your lives!

Dennis Miller’s “Miller Time” segment on O’Reilly tonight was nothing short of brilliant. Miller correctly extracts himself from the Hollywood left, but reminds Bill of their self-anointed power. This is a truly great segment from Dennis.

Watch Miller Time here.

Ann Coulter was on Cavuto today, and David Asman was filling in for Neal. David got to talk to Ann about the situation with Sandy “Pants” Burglar versus the Scooter Libby non-issue, and why these issues are being treated so differently (this has been a burning question in my mind, too). As Ann so expertly does, she explains only what the common person already knows; that there’s a double standard in the media for liberals vs. conservatives, and liberals always get off the hook.

So why is this CIA non-leak case still going on, but Sandy Pants got away with barely a slap on the wrist (not to mention what Clinton more than likely got away with because of Pants’ actions)? And what does Ann think about the Rosie/Donald thing, and about the Hillary thing? I’ll bet you have a pretty good idea.

Watch Ann’s reaction here.