<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ann Coulter at CPAC (VIDEO)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/03/ann-coulter-at-cpac-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/03/ann-coulter-at-cpac-video/</link>
	<description>Reality Bytes</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Milty</title>
		<link>http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/03/ann-coulter-at-cpac-video/#comment-14061</link>
		<dc:creator>Milty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 22:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/03/ann-coulter-at-cpac-video/#comment-14061</guid>
		<description>Coulter threw Edderds a bone.

After all, this was the same weekend when Edderds lay low and shewed himself a coward who'll play by the PC rules, by refusing to cross state lines and enter his slicky pony in the Race for the Race Card tournament in Selma. The Lefts answer to Nascar™.

But the Billeree and al-O-bama can stoop so low. How fair is that?

Coulter outed poor unnoticed, unmentioned, ignored Jonathon Livingston Edwards, not as anything but a feckless politico.

So, I guess its still ok for the Media to say "Mark Foley, you faggott ", so long as you don't use &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; term, and you do it in a nice, caring way.

Because &lt;i&gt;someone&lt;/i&gt; had to summon the courage to stand up to the self-segregated, those who remained silent, and censored and cross that bridge! And spawn a torrent of Newspaper Jargon™! And Politically Correct Righteous Indignation™!

And give poor Edderds at least a mention, when a white suthun lawyer must check his ethnicitay at the state line, and dare not show his fake, uh, face at a high profile media circle jerk, and campaign event.

&lt;b&gt;Update:&lt;/b&gt;And it looks like Edwards can use all the help he can get. Today Edwards held a fund razer in Houston and 100 people showed up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coulter threw Edderds a bone.</p>
<p>After all, this was the same weekend when Edderds lay low and shewed himself a coward who&#8217;ll play by the PC rules, by refusing to cross state lines and enter his slicky pony in the Race for the Race Card tournament in Selma. The Lefts answer to Nascar™.</p>
<p>But the Billeree and al-O-bama can stoop so low. How fair is that?</p>
<p>Coulter outed poor unnoticed, unmentioned, ignored Jonathon Livingston Edwards, not as anything but a feckless politico.</p>
<p>So, I guess its still ok for the Media to say &#8220;Mark Foley, you faggott &#8220;, so long as you don&#8217;t use <i>that</i> term, and you do it in a nice, caring way.</p>
<p>Because <i>someone</i> had to summon the courage to stand up to the self-segregated, those who remained silent, and censored and cross that bridge! And spawn a torrent of Newspaper Jargon™! And Politically Correct Righteous Indignation™!</p>
<p>And give poor Edderds at least a mention, when a white suthun lawyer must check his ethnicitay at the state line, and dare not show his fake, uh, face at a high profile media circle jerk, and campaign event.</p>
<p><b>Update:</b>And it looks like Edwards can use all the help he can get. Today Edwards held a fund razer in Houston and 100 people showed up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milty</title>
		<link>http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/03/ann-coulter-at-cpac-video/#comment-114963</link>
		<dc:creator>Milty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 19:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/03/ann-coulter-at-cpac-video/#comment-114963</guid>
		<description>Coulter threw Edderds a bone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After all, this was the same weekend when Edderds lay low and shewed himself a coward who&#39;ll play by the PC rules, by refusing to cross state lines and enter his slicky pony in the Race for the Race Card tournament in Selma. The Lefts answer to Nascar™.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But the Billeree and al-O-bama can stoop so low. How fair is that?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Coulter outed poor unnoticed, unmentioned, ignored Jonathon Livingston Edwards, not as anything but a feckless politico.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, I guess its still ok for the Media to say "Mark Foley, you faggott ", so long as you don&#39;t use &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; term, and you do it in a nice, caring way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because &lt;i&gt;someone&lt;/i&gt; had to summon the courage to stand up to the self-segregated, those who remained silent, and censored and cross that bridge! And spawn a torrent of Newspaper Jargon™! And Politically Correct Righteous Indignation™!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And give poor Edderds at least a mention, when a white suthun lawyer must check his ethnicitay at the state line, and dare not show his fake, uh, face at a high profile media circle jerk, and campaign event.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Update:&lt;/b&gt;And it looks like Edwards can use all the help he can get. Today Edwards held a fund razer in Houston and 100 people showed up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coulter threw Edderds a bone.</p>
<p>After all, this was the same weekend when Edderds lay low and shewed himself a coward who&#39;ll play by the PC rules, by refusing to cross state lines and enter his slicky pony in the Race for the Race Card tournament in Selma. The Lefts answer to Nascar™.</p>
<p>But the Billeree and al-O-bama can stoop so low. How fair is that?</p>
<p>Coulter outed poor unnoticed, unmentioned, ignored Jonathon Livingston Edwards, not as anything but a feckless politico.</p>
<p>So, I guess its still ok for the Media to say &#8220;Mark Foley, you faggott &#8220;, so long as you don&#39;t use <i>that</i> term, and you do it in a nice, caring way.</p>
<p>Because <i>someone</i> had to summon the courage to stand up to the self-segregated, those who remained silent, and censored and cross that bridge! And spawn a torrent of Newspaper Jargon™! And Politically Correct Righteous Indignation™!</p>
<p>And give poor Edderds at least a mention, when a white suthun lawyer must check his ethnicitay at the state line, and dare not show his fake, uh, face at a high profile media circle jerk, and campaign event.</p>
<p><b>Update:</b>And it looks like Edwards can use all the help he can get. Today Edwards held a fund razer in Houston and 100 people showed up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/03/ann-coulter-at-cpac-video/#comment-13895</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/03/ann-coulter-at-cpac-video/#comment-13895</guid>
		<description>To clarify, my response was to what Jim Sorrells wrote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To clarify, my response was to what Jim Sorrells wrote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/03/ann-coulter-at-cpac-video/#comment-13893</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/03/ann-coulter-at-cpac-video/#comment-13893</guid>
		<description>Absolutely.  The two things are unrelated.  YOU might call her statement invective, but in fact it is quite on point.  This was demonstrated by the ridiculous over-reaction it caused.

If you get subtle encouragement from her words, you are MISSING the point.  We are free to use whatever words we choose here, including "nigger", "kike" and "spic".  If there are negative consequences from simply using a WORD that someone else finds offensive, part of the blame is in the oversensitized, politically correct sanitization of our modern discourse, and part is in the overly impressionable mind of the offendee.  

One day I said the word "fuc*" under my breath at a post office.  From the reaction of some of the people in line behind me, you would think I had just murdered a little old lady or something!  People need to be more careful about what  upsets them, or they will die decades before their time from the stress! (Darwinism in action!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely.  The two things are unrelated.  YOU might call her statement invective, but in fact it is quite on point.  This was demonstrated by the ridiculous over-reaction it caused.</p>
<p>If you get subtle encouragement from her words, you are MISSING the point.  We are free to use whatever words we choose here, including &#8220;nigger&#8221;, &#8220;kike&#8221; and &#8220;spic&#8221;.  If there are negative consequences from simply using a WORD that someone else finds offensive, part of the blame is in the oversensitized, politically correct sanitization of our modern discourse, and part is in the overly impressionable mind of the offendee.  </p>
<p>One day I said the word &#8220;fuc*&#8221; under my breath at a post office.  From the reaction of some of the people in line behind me, you would think I had just murdered a little old lady or something!  People need to be more careful about what  upsets them, or they will die decades before their time from the stress! (Darwinism in action!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/03/ann-coulter-at-cpac-video/#comment-13879</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/03/ann-coulter-at-cpac-video/#comment-13879</guid>
		<description>My normally-sane-and-conservative husband disagree on this one. He saw the "faggot" slur. I saw the "uphold freedom of speech, damn it!" argument.

I wonder if this issue is a little like those old pictures, where if you look at it one way it's a beautiful woman and if you look at it a different way it's an old hag . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My normally-sane-and-conservative husband disagree on this one. He saw the &#8220;faggot&#8221; slur. I saw the &#8220;uphold freedom of speech, damn it!&#8221; argument.</p>
<p>I wonder if this issue is a little like those old pictures, where if you look at it one way it&#8217;s a beautiful woman and if you look at it a different way it&#8217;s an old hag . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/03/ann-coulter-at-cpac-video/#comment-114964</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/03/ann-coulter-at-cpac-video/#comment-114964</guid>
		<description>To clarify, my response was to what Jim Sorrells wrote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To clarify, my response was to what Jim Sorrells wrote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/03/ann-coulter-at-cpac-video/#comment-114965</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/03/ann-coulter-at-cpac-video/#comment-114965</guid>
		<description>Absolutely.  The two things are unrelated.  YOU might call her statement invective, but in fact it is quite on point.  This was demonstrated by the ridiculous over-reaction it caused.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you get subtle encouragement from her words, you are MISSING the point.  We are free to use whatever words we choose here, including "nigger", "kike" and "spic".  If there are negative consequences from simply using a WORD that someone else finds offensive, part of the blame is in the oversensitized, politically correct sanitization of our modern discourse, and part is in the overly impressionable mind of the offendee.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One day I said the word "fuc*" under my breath at a post office.  From the reaction of some of the people in line behind me, you would think I had just murdered a little old lady or something!  People need to be more careful about what  upsets them, or they will die decades before their time from the stress! (Darwinism in action!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely.  The two things are unrelated.  YOU might call her statement invective, but in fact it is quite on point.  This was demonstrated by the ridiculous over-reaction it caused.</p>
<p>If you get subtle encouragement from her words, you are MISSING the point.  We are free to use whatever words we choose here, including &#8220;nigger&#8221;, &#8220;kike&#8221; and &#8220;spic&#8221;.  If there are negative consequences from simply using a WORD that someone else finds offensive, part of the blame is in the oversensitized, politically correct sanitization of our modern discourse, and part is in the overly impressionable mind of the offendee.  </p>
<p>One day I said the word &#8220;fuc*&#8221; under my breath at a post office.  From the reaction of some of the people in line behind me, you would think I had just murdered a little old lady or something!  People need to be more careful about what  upsets them, or they will die decades before their time from the stress! (Darwinism in action!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/03/ann-coulter-at-cpac-video/#comment-114966</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/03/ann-coulter-at-cpac-video/#comment-114966</guid>
		<description>My normally-sane-and-conservative husband disagree on this one. He saw the "faggot" slur. I saw the "uphold freedom of speech, damn it!" argument.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wonder if this issue is a little like those old pictures, where if you look at it one way it&#39;s a beautiful woman and if you look at it a different way it&#39;s an old hag . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My normally-sane-and-conservative husband disagree on this one. He saw the &#8220;faggot&#8221; slur. I saw the &#8220;uphold freedom of speech, damn it!&#8221; argument.</p>
<p>I wonder if this issue is a little like those old pictures, where if you look at it one way it&#39;s a beautiful woman and if you look at it a different way it&#39;s an old hag . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Sorrells</title>
		<link>http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/03/ann-coulter-at-cpac-video/#comment-13832</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Sorrells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 18:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/03/ann-coulter-at-cpac-video/#comment-13832</guid>
		<description>Apparently, Ms. Coulter doesn't realize that her use of words like "faggot" gives subtle encouragement to people like the young men in San Francisco who beat the Baker's Dozen male chorus from Yale screaming "Faggot!" Would she also think it clever and funny to use "nigger," "kike," and "spic?" Would you who support her also find it funny?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, Ms. Coulter doesn&#8217;t realize that her use of words like &#8220;faggot&#8221; gives subtle encouragement to people like the young men in San Francisco who beat the Baker&#8217;s Dozen male chorus from Yale screaming &#8220;Faggot!&#8221; Would she also think it clever and funny to use &#8220;nigger,&#8221; &#8220;kike,&#8221; and &#8220;spic?&#8221; Would you who support her also find it funny?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/03/ann-coulter-at-cpac-video/#comment-13821</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 18:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/03/ann-coulter-at-cpac-video/#comment-13821</guid>
		<description>I find it amazing that so many people who are too ignorant to understand Ms. Coulter's brand of humor/satire refuse to have it explained to them.  She is absolutely brilliant, managing to rattle cages and inspire "rage" from those arrogant "progressives" as she strikes them close to home.  I absolutely LOVE her.  I love to see the liberals turn beet red and start to stutter with spittle streaming from their screaming little mouths!  Think a bit and try to see what she is trying to say.  She is honest and sooooooo correct!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it amazing that so many people who are too ignorant to understand Ms. Coulter&#8217;s brand of humor/satire refuse to have it explained to them.  She is absolutely brilliant, managing to rattle cages and inspire &#8220;rage&#8221; from those arrogant &#8220;progressives&#8221; as she strikes them close to home.  I absolutely LOVE her.  I love to see the liberals turn beet red and start to stutter with spittle streaming from their screaming little mouths!  Think a bit and try to see what she is trying to say.  She is honest and sooooooo correct!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
