MsUnderestimated » 2006 » October

Nominee For Stupidest Bitch Ever (VIDEO)

October 7th, 2006 at 09:07 by MsUnderestimated

Folks, I caught her on H&C last night or the night before, but tonight she was on with John Kasich of Heartland about the attack on the Minutemen at Columbia University. Do I know her name? Yep. Am I going to print it here? Nope. You can watch the video yourself and send her a virtual slap across the face. She SOOO deserves it!

“Don’t patronize me… I don’t care about your parents.” ??? Bet her mom is OH so proud of her for THAT one on national TV! Stupid bitch! Since she was never spanked as a child (obviously), perhaps a good ol’ fashioned ass whoopin’ is appropriate now as a chronological adult.

Watch her show her ass, and John set her straight, here.

Choose Options to Share This Post

More »

Ann Coulter on Upcoming Election Issues (VIDEO)

October 7th, 2006 at 08:51 by MsUnderestimated

Today, Ann was on with Brian Wilson about what the issues will be for the upcoming elections. Obviously, the Foley issue was a topic, and Ann just ran with it. Brilliant as always, she nails it.

If only I had her political and historical acumen… *sigh*… Watch the video here.

Choose Options to Share This Post

More »

Julie On Shirley Phelps: “She’s an Airtime Whore” (VIDEO)

October 7th, 2006 at 06:26 by MsUnderestimated

Mike Gallagher was on Fox News today with Julie Banderas, talking about what Julie referred to as his “deal with devil,” giving Shirly Phelps Roper one hour of airtime in exchange for the Westboro Baptist Church signing a contract promising they would stay away from the little Amish girls funerals. As many of you know, Julie has her own past history dealing with Shirley-girl, and quite frankly, it makes me want to stand up and cheer! Here it is from last June.

Not to disappoint today, Julie asked Mike what Shirley might have done with the $50,000 he offered her first, and Mike suggested perhaps an air conditioner for their “church.” Julie thought it might have been better spent on a haircut, then Mike added “and a makeover” too. HAHA.

Ever the sharp-tongued, strongly opinionated Julie, when Mike said she turned the money down but accepted the offer of a forum to spew her venom, Julie appropriately referred to her as an airtime whore. Man, I love it!

Watch Julie and Mike discuss that here.

Choose Options to Share This Post

More »

Support for Wild Bill from Kenneth Lamb

October 7th, 2006 at 01:57 by MsUnderestimated

I want you all to see an email that a gentleman named Kenneth Lamb sent to both Wild Bill and myself. Mr. Lamb has given me full permission to post this.

I read the email from the attorney.

His client is now what is known under the law as a “semi-public” personality, if in fact not a “public personality,” given the scope of the story, the breadth of its dissemination, and the fact that his client is employed as a political operative in an active campaign for the governorship.

Unless the subject’s attorney can demonstrate that you published “with a reckless disregard for the truth” in a “malicious manner,” he can go pound sand. If the IM scammer thinks this is the best legal representation he can get, he’s cooked.

I thought the most foolish part of his email had to do with premising you must have someone’s “authorization” to run his client’s name or photograph. The guy is a campaign staffer, and this is legitimate news affecting the campaign with which he is associated.

He appears publicly in connection with the campaign as a matter of his employment; does this attorney think news organizations around the world have to either get his client’s permission to have his image in a photo, or else brush stroke the guy out if they don’t? What a maroon.

Well, I guess you have to give the attorney 2 points for trying to bluff you into submission. While he is suggesting you seek an attorney familiar with civil and criminal liability, he may want to contact an attorney himself to stop having a “fool for a client” when considering exactly what you will be able to subpoena and depose if a civil suit is filed - multiplied infinitely if a criminal investigation began. There are no Fifth Amendment claims in a civil suit. Ask OJ Simpson.

To sum up what I would tell the attorney threatening me with civil and criminal liability: “Oh Br’er Fox - please don’t throw me into that briar patch . . .”

All the remarks I’ve made are my personal opinion, and in no way should be constructed to reflect the opinion of the publications for which I write. Feel free to publish this if it will get the attorney to stop making a national fool of himself.

Kenneth E. Lamb

Program Host for
“CyberSmart! Saturday” ™
“Your Turn”
“Link to Life” ™ hurricane expert

Blogs authored by Kenneth E. Lamb / blogger profile listed at:
http://www.blogger.com/profile/14444338

email: mailto:kenneth@kennethelamb.com
web: http://www.kennethelamb.com
bio: http://www.kennethelamb.com/bio.htm

He invited Bill to call into his radio program today, but Bill didn’t read the email in time. I encourage you all to write Mr. Lamb and thank him for his voice of support. Perhaps when Bill can get a chance to call into his show, some of us can be callers and support Bill on the air. I know I will.

Stop the ACLU is having an open trackback Friday.

Choose Options to Share This Post