MsUnderestimated » 2006 » March

Commemorate Philadelphia's World Series VICTORY
with a Phillies Jersey and other Phillies Memorabilia at low prices.

Pedophiles Have a Friend in the CA Courts

March 6th, 2006 at 10:16 by MsUnderestimated

Are you 21 or older and want to engage in oral sex with someone 16- or 17-years of age? Never fear, the California courts are here to save the day and protect your “freedoms”! What lunacy has gripped the west (left) coast to allow this kind of crap, when we have enough trouble tracking these monsters of society already?

In Sacramento today, the AP reports that the California Supreme Court has ruled, and overturned “state law requiring adults 21 years or older who are convicted of having oral sex with 16- and 17-year-olds to automatically register as a sex offender for life.”

Hmmm…. wouldn’t want to needlessly inconvenience these pedophiles now, would we? I know that some of you libs are asking “what’s the big deal with the age difference between someone 21 and another 16 or 17?” Well, my answer back to you is READ THE DAMN RULING. It reads “21 years or older.” In other words, Grandpa Perv, or Gym Teacher Friendly anywhere from 21 to 67 (or older) could engage in oral sex with children as young as 16 or 17 without consequence!

What part of “lunacy” does California not understand? I gotta tell you something - all of the crazy leftist crap that’s come out of the west coast of late, this may be at the top of the Cream of the Crazy Crop.

Time to call out the big guns for this one….. O’Reilly, John Walsh, Mark Klaas, Hannity,
Mark Lunsford, etc. This has GOT to be challenged, and ultimately sent to the Supreme Court. I think our children will fare better there.

From the AP article, I offer you the following for an attempt at digestion (have the Prilosec handy?):

Sacramento (AP) - California’s justices overturned state law requiring adults 21 years or older who are convicted of having oral sex with 16- and 17-year-olds to automatically register as a sex offender for life.

The California Supreme Court, ruling 6-1, said the law, first adopted in 1947, was unconstitutional.

The majority said that the law was too harsh or unfair because adults 21 or older who are convicted of having sex with minors ages 16 and 17 are not automatically required to register as sex offenders.

The justices pointed out that lawmakers declined to treat both categories of offenders equally three times in the last 10 years.

The court noted that, because the law did not treat the two categories of sex offenders similarly, the law violated both state and federal equal protection rights.

“Mandatory lifetime registration of all persons who, like defendant here, were convicted of voluntary oral copulation with a minor of the age of 16 or 17, but not of someone convicted of voluntary sexual intercourse with a minor of the same age, violates the equal protection clauses of the federal and state constitutions,” Justice Joyce Kennard wrote for the majority.

Adults who have sexual activity with children under 16 are required to register.

The state maintains a public database with personal information of registered sex offenders.

The justices, however, left intact a provision granting trial judges the discretion to demand registration for both categories of adult sex offenders - those that have oral sex or intercourse with minors ages 16 and 17.

The case was brought by Vincent Hofsheier of Santa Cruz County, who was convicted in 2003 of having oral sex with a 16-year-old girl.

He was sentenced to 120 days in jail.

Neither his attorney, Paul Couenhoven, nor the California Attorney General’s office returned calls for comment.

Justice Marvin Baxter was the lone dissent.

“As any teenager or adult knows, intercourse is distinct from oral copulation, involving a wholly different sexual act that, unlike oral copulation, may result in pregnancy and the birth of a child,” he wrote.

“Given this significant difference in the potential real-life consequences of the two acts, the Legislature reasonably could decide that different registration schemes for the two groups of offenders are appropriate as a matter of public policy.”

The case is People v. Hofsheier, S124636.

“Given this significant difference in the potential real-life consequences of the two acts, the Legislature reasonably could decide that different registration schemes for the two groups of offenders are appropriate as a matter of public policy?” ???????????

How in the hell is there a distinction between oral sex with a minor, and ACTUAL sex with a minor? Does the person getting oral gratification submit the victim to a lesser crime?

Oh, sorry forgot… thank you Bill Clinton, for telling us that oral sex is NOT sex. You SO inspired the youth of today. You are an asshat deluxe, and should have been taken out of the gene pool a long time ago. It will take our culture DECADES to overcome your bullshit line about “I never had sexual relations with that woman….” lie. You only gave millions of teens all over the country the conviction to believe that what they were having the high school (and some grade & middle school) girls do to/for them was NOT sex. You are and always will be one of the most damaging presidents in U.S. history.

And what is this about “registration schemes for the two groups”? THEY’RE BOTH EVIL, AND ONE IN THE SAME! The child is forever scarred, and it doesn’t matter if their molestation was oral, vagina/anal, or inappropriate touching! It’s ALL condemnable and should be given the same punishment no matter what! Are the lunatic judges running this asylum in California? Apparently so.

If you could see what I have seen from an investigator’s standpoint, you would be appalled, disgusted, sickened, and infuriated. It’s not grown women who look young, wearing pigtails and Catholic school girl skirts. The crap these guys share and trade consists of TRUE homemade movies and stills, and they not only involve the young teens, but some of the most horrific I’ve seen include those who have less than 2 years on this planet. Disgusting is not strong enough to describe what I’ve seen.

Are you sick already? You should be. Now start writing and emailing your Senators! And if you’re a compassionate conserative in California, GET OUT while the getting’s good. The moral erosion of the west coast is blatantly clear, evident, and obviously unstoppable.

Lifetime registration? How about castration and lifetime chemical effeminization! SIGN ME UP! I’ll back that one in a heart beat, and bring the needle and hormones.

Seen at StopTheACLU.

Choose Options to Share This Post